Carpenters [8]

Welcome to Episode 8 of the Medieval England History Series! We’ve been through quite a few occupations and types of people now and it’s time to begin to explore further afield to the useful carpenter. This is a series you can listen to on Spotify here, and you can find the other posts here. Be sure to follow my site for more episodes and post any thoughts you have in the comments on something you enjoyed about the episode or series so far.


Before we delve into the medieval carpenter, we should first cover the career of a carpenter through history in general, and indeed a career it is. Carpentry is one of the world’s oldest professions (the oldest is tool maker, who used chunks of rock to pound, and flakes made from quartz and flint to make stone tools.) The son of God, Jesus Christ was himself described as a carpenter. Today carpenters are still a priced trade skill in the construction industry and are quite well paid compared with other roles.

But with medieval carpenters things go something like this… Medieval carpenters were highly skilled professionals who would cut timber (wood) to make a variety of planks, beams, doors, windows and furniture. They were producing items for homes, castles, workshops, shops, ports and more.

As with other professions such as the Baker, carpenters were also a part of a Guild specific to the profession. They would join as an apprentice and be taught the skills of the craft; including the use of tools, woodworking techniques and the mathematics required. After the training they could expect to go on to hone their skills further themselves as a journeyman, gaining enough experience to eventually become a master carpenter. The path of learning is similar to other professions, and the path structure is still used today for a variety of crafts. A very skilled carpenter could potentially be employed by the Kings or nobles, being retained in employment as specialists (in a castle, and during travel). A guild of carpenters became a reality when in the 900s the towns began to stabilise their economies and expand, allowing more work. Most towns in England were built near castles (as mentioned sometimes within the walls). Most guild formed officially around the 12th century.

A carpenter guild was designed to allow fair competition and agreement of the basic rules governing their trade. Guilds had the power to fine carpenters who violated their rules, but also took care of carpenters should they become unwell and arrange for burials and take care of carpenter families if needed. They contributed to supporting their town by building churches for example.

A master carpenter or highly skilled professional in woodworking could expect a decent amount of work and pay. They used a variety of tools of course. See the picture above for some examples (saw, adze, awl). Others included the: hatchet, twybill and broad axe, gimlet, compass, square and ruler, twyvette, saws, plane, chisel and gauge, marking gauge, crowbar and hammer. A carpenter would use a whetstone to sharpen the tools if needed.

Some tools were said to be found in the Mastermyr chest – a Viking age tool chest in the Mastermyr mire west of Hemse on the island of Gotland, Sweden. The largest tool finds in Europe (793-1066). Proving to some extent that the carpenter tools of that age were still very much prized. Of course the Vikings are known for large wooden ships, so it made sense to employ a selection of carpenters for the job of building them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A4stermyr_chest

Above is an example of a 16 century wooden chair no doubt made by a carpenter.

A slightly more modern Tudor chest above. See the detail of the carpenter.

The house above was built in 1509. A carpenter would have done a significant part of the work as you can see from the wood structure.


Thanks for reading Episode 8 of the Medieval England History series. I hope to see you next time. In the meantime, support this series by liking and commenting and follow to stay up to date with the newest releases.

https://cdnjs.buymeacoffee.com/1.0.0/button.prod.min.js

Bakers (7)

Welcome to part 7 of the Medieval England History series. This episode will focus on another important and often overlooked role, that of the medieval baker. If you enjoy this series then please check back regularly for more entries and be sure to listen on Spotify if you would prefer. If you want to suggest an episode please do so in the comments below or use the contact page.


Bakers were a very important role in medieval England. They would be responsible for providing food (bread) to a village or more commonly, the nobles or royalty.

As mentioned in the earlier post on medieval cooks, the main staple of diet was bread. Bakers and their bread being at the heart of the majorities diet. Cereals were also an early medieval age staple, until rice and potatoes were later introduced. The poor ate barley, oat and rye. Whereas the governing ate wheat. Bread, porridge, gruel, pasta, fava beans and vegetables were eaten by all members of society.

Baker’s ovens were often separated from other buildings and occasionally located outside of city walls to reduce the risk of fires. These ovens were expensive investment and required trained operation by the bakers.

Baker’s production was heavily regulated because bread was an important staple food – eaten by all. In 1267 Henry III promulgated the Assize of Bread and Ale to impose regulations such as inspection and verification of weights and measures, and quality and price control!

Baker’s played an important role in the guild system; master bakers frequently instructed apprentices and were assisted by journeymen. In 1155 a ‘fraternity’ of bakers existed in London, and the Worshipful Company of Bakers was formed by a charter in 1486, 1569 and 1685.

At the time baker’s produced bread, preservatives were not exactly available as they are today. Because of this, during times of famine the monarch would force bakers to make bread well below the market price in order to prevent people from starving. The point of the guild was to ensure that bakers had enough bread for themselves and their families.

In order to make bread the bakers and indeed the people needed to plant and grow grain in fields. This in itself took time. So as you can imagine there would have been a market of trade involving the selling and buying of grain – which still exists today. A city or village growing its own grain would be considerably more well off in terms of bread production – provided they had a baker and ovens – if they grew their own grain. Grain was used as a currency for peasants occasionally.

After growing grain it had to be separated from the chaff and ground. Remember the Lord’s mill or miller? Well, the separation was conducted at the Lord’s mill or general miller who would grind it down for a fee. (Maybe they would accept some money or a loaf of bread afterwards?). The ground grain became flour. Flour is the key ingredient in dough, and in turn bread.

Flour was used to make dough. Another key ingredient required was yeast, and this was sourced frequently from beer. Combining the flour and yeast once could then bake the dough in an oven. Depending on where the oven was it may have cost to use it. A communal oven would charge, whereas a private oven in a castle or manor might not. Dough could also be baked on an open fire as long as it was turned frequently to prevent burning.

However, the bakers had the law on their side. Prices for oven usage was fixed by law for town bakers, meaning they could not be overcharged. So, the baker would push the dough into the ovens using a large long handled paddle. The result of using the ovens resulted in burned bottoms which were given to the peasants or servants in a manor of the Lord.

The three step process was fairly easy to understand yet bakers were so important. Without these vital people the towns and cities would have starved. Bread is still a main staple in a lot of peoples diets even in the 21st century. The process is also pretty much the same. Grown grain, turn grain to flour, combine with yeast, make the dough, bake the dough and eat.

Everyone ate bread. But not everyone ate the same bread. Although grain was used commonly so were other types of crops. Oat, rye and barley being other options available to the baker to work with depending on location and crop availability.

Medieval bread was called unleavened bread. This bread was thick and dense and difficult to digest. It was baked thin and also used as plates to hold the rest of the meals! Imagine the beef or potatoes on top of bread. Sounds like a Sunday roast!

Other cheaper bread were combined breads. Cheat was whole wheat without bran. Horse bread was made from anything and combined with peas and beans for example.

Other treats like biscuis could be made as well. Bakers would bake their breads twice, leaving it easy to preserve. The biscuits were easier to store for winter, and better suited to war and travel.

The skills required of a baker are specific and recorded for you to read. From the medieval bakers literally feeding entire towns to modern day bake offs, you can try it. I encourage you to try baking for yourself – starting from the basic bread to more complicated delicacies.

Song Bird

A song bird chirps to mark the rise of the sun

long lost allies constantly on the run

the war has all but been done

where the men stand and fight

where they give in to the enemies might

where the song bird chirps to their delight

calling and reason

to ears open to treason

is but a change of season.

How The Napoleonic Wars Started: The French Revolution

Welcome to episode 1 of the Napoleonic Wars History, which I hope you will enjoy reading. In this episode we will look at how the massive Napoleonic empire began, its origins and why it started.

  1. Introduction
  2. How it Started
  3. Concluding Remarks
  4. Further Reading

Introduction

The Napoleonic Wars were a set of conflicts between Napoleonic France and the alliances of other European powers. The wars spanned from 1800 to 1815 during which Napoleon was a feared leader of France and a time in which people admired him greatly, just as much as they hated him.

Prior to the Napoleonic wars however, France saw The French Revolution span from 1792 to 1799 and can in a sense be included into the Napoleonic wars, making it one long war.

How it Started

The French Revolution prior to the Napoleonic Wars was undoubtedly a key reason for the continuing wars within Europe. The French Revolution was a social resistance beginning in 1787 continuing to 1799. The people sought to change the relationship between the rulers and those they governed, to change the political power structure.

It was during the time of the bourgeoisie (merchants, manufacturers, professionals) who had gained financial power yet were excluded from political power. However, those socially lower than them had very few rights if any and were poor. There was a clear class divide. The monarchy was soon viewed as no longer divinely ordained, so when the kin wanted to increase the taxes on the poor including new classes, revolution was the inevitable outcome.

The French uprooted the monarchy and the feudal system in place. This was caused by the disgust at the aristocracy mentioned above and the policies of the King – King Louise XVI. The King was guillotined as was his wife. The beginning of democracy or liberty, which shapes society today and the idea of which persevered through the Napoleonic wars. The will of the people succeeded.

A time of huge inflation not unlike today. Bread prices skyrocketed and was likely the main food source for many households. Couple this with soaring taxes.

On the 18 May 1803 Britain declared war on France and so the wars began following the revolution. The Bourbons were overthrown by Napoleon but would later resume power after his downfall.

As you can see huge dissatisfaction in the French Revolution outcomes resulted in Napoleon taking the lead of the French people seeking to conquer Europe. The wars were initiated by other monarchies to help ‘win’ the crown back for the Bourbons. Napoleon on the other hand did not want this monarchy, nor did the people.

They wanted democracy which would not exist for many years. They wanted liberty but the ruling elite used war to defeat them. Does this sound familiar? If they had have lost power, the world may look very different today and it is possible Britain might not even have a monarchy.

At the height of Napoleons French Empire he had successfully conquered most of Europe. Without the Napoleonic wars the Napoleonic code would not have come about. Without the French Revolution there would be no current democracy.

Despite being 200+ years ago, the ideas are still standing strong. Today we see the unbalance between the ruling elite, the monarchy and the rest of us – the poor. No matter what, we will not see a power struggle like this again unless it is a world war and given the technology and weapons today would be catastrophic. They are afraid to become normal people and have to remain in control in their reptilian like ordered organisations. Think about what they have and haven’t done. Then look at what Napoleon did.

Concluding Remarks

The beginning of a huge European and even worldwide Empire, the Napoleonic wars were interesting, and are hugely moving when you take the time to learn about them. This series will continue to explore this period. Next, we will look at the inital war after Napoleon took power. We will even look at some of the huge navel battles, involving hundreds of ships, hundreds of feet wide and high. Until then thank you for reading.

Further Reading

https://www.britannica.com/event/French-Revolution

https://www.britannica.com/event/Napoleonic-Wars

History of the Maltese Cross

Welcome to this short post on the history of the Maltese cross. It is a rich and frequently used symbol throughout society.

The Maltese cross is used in medals, coats of arms and architecture.

The Maltese cross first originated within the medieval period, the middle ages – or the time of the crusades.

The cross is mostly associated with the Knights Hospitallers – aka, the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem or the Knights of Malta – since around 1567.

The organisation was founded or established during the crusades to care for the pilgrims in the Holy Land. Later on did the symbol become militarised when the Hospitallers began to fight alongside the Knight Templar.

The symbol is also known as the Amalfi cross – which refers to the small coastal town of Amalfi, in Italy.

What does the Maltese Cross Mean?

You may refer to the picture above to get the meaning. Aside from the above which refers to the 8 points. The cross is also used by some fire departments. It therefore represents bravery and courage in the face of adversity, with the aim of protecting and fighting for others. It is primarily a Christian symbol.

Today the symbol is frequent throughout Malta, and is used by the airline.


I hope you enjoyed this very short post. I also have a shirt with the symbol on. I know you can buy a variety of shirts, jumpers, or clothing with the symbol on. Just look online for something if you are interested. It doesn’t even have religious associations as its primary association anymore, as its used in such a wide variety of organisations.

my shirt

The Napoleonic Wars

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleonic_Wars)

The Napoleonic Wars were a series of major global conflicts putting the French Empire – led by Napoleon I – and its allies against a ton of European states formed into various coalitions. For a time, Europe was dominated by France, the result of which had stemmed largely from the disputes associated with the French Revolution.

The Napoleonic wars are seen as five major conflicts; termed after the coalition that fought Napoleon.

: the Third Coalition (1803–1806), the Fourth (1806–07), the Fifth (1809), the Sixth (1813–14), and the Seventh (1815) plus the Peninsular War (1807–1814) and the French invasion of Russia (1812). (Wikipedia).

From the battles of Leipzig to the concluding showdown at Waterloo, this was certaintly a series of world wars if there ever was one. It involved not only European powers, but continents such as Africa, South America and Asia.

https://www.britannica.com/event/Napoleonic-Wars

I’ll be covering this series of battles just as I am writing about Medieval England (sorry I haven’t added to that in a while!)

The series will simply be called Napoleonic Wars and will look at the rise and fall of a massive empire, how it influenced society today and some awesome battles tactics, formations and even some war gaming! Stay tuned!

The Worst European Country?!

  1. Introduction
  2. Brief History
  3. The Unrecognised State of Transnistria
  4. How Does Something Become a Country?
  5. Tourism in Moldova
  6. Conclusion

Introduction

Moldova! A European country.
The flag of Moldova

Wedged between Ukraine and Romania. The primary language is Romanian. The capital is Chisinau.

A population of 2.64 million and a 2019 GDP of 27.27 billion.

Despite being the poorest country in Europe it has a life expectancy of 66 years for men and 73 years for women.

Brief History

In 1812 (the same year as the battle of Napoleonic Wars which took place from around 1800 to 1815. (They were a continuation of the French Revolutionary wars, which ran from 1792 to 1799. Together these conflicts represented 23 years of nearly uninterrupted war in Europe.) – the Treaty of Bucharest granted Russia control of eastern Moldova or Bessarabia.

In 1991, after the failed Soviet coup d’état attempt, Moldova declared independence. In 1994, The Constitution of Moldova set the framework for the government of the country.

In 2014 – Moldova signs association agreement with the European Union, prompting Russia to impose import restrictions on the country’s agricultural produce.

The Unrecognised State of Transnistria

Trans-Dniester. The state or country that seeks independence is not officially recognised at all as a country. It is a country that does not exist. Most people would argue it’s a part of Moldova. But it is supported in most ways – including defence – by Russia.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18284837

This separation occurred following a war between. The reality is that it exists and can be found on maps and is recognised by states. Therefore its failure to gain independence doesn’t really mean that much. It’s already a state because it has a clear border and name and authority governing it.

How Does Something Become a Country?

To become a state however, or sovereign country, the place needs to be recognised by the United Nations and needs to satisfy the requirements they set out.

https://www.un.org/en/ga/about/ropga/adms.shtml – before going further you may be interested in learning about Hobbes – https://www.britannica.com/topic/Leviathan-by-Hobbes

The route to independence could be between the constitutional theory and declarative theory. The state needs to be a place, have laws etc. and government which will help.

International law does not prohibit a declaration of independence, and the recognition of a country is a political issue. (Wikipedia.org).

Tourism in Moldova

Tourism exists but it isn’t going to be great. The international airport is situated in the capital of Chisinau.

The tourism focuses on the country’s natural landscapes and its history. Wine tours are offered to tourists across the country.

2018. (Despite the low numbers, the GDP is high)

CountryTourists
1 Romania2 524 403
2 Ukraine1 069 066
3 Russia322 256
4 Bulgaria78 870
5 Italy46 594
6 Germany30 061
7 Israel28 358
8 Turkey25 936
9 United States25 778
10 Belarus20 039
Total4, 334, 215
Wikipedia.

There are certainly more visitors from other countries. Maybe they haven’t been documented, but they are on YouTube for you to watch.

Conclusion

It’s a small country with the attached unrecognisable state and a fair sized populace.

Is it the worst? Infrastructure and the economy would say no. I’ve seen worse places with less. Who knows who will like this place. Will you?

Thanks for reading!

(On YouTube you can find the videos) I found this one:

What is Happening? (opinionated)

Let’s forget about the fact the country is in chaos, and has been for 2 years and wash it away with cake, alcohol and jubilations for the rich whilst the poor struggle to make ends meat.

Have a read of the above quote, tell me below how you feel about that. How exactly do you feel? Angry, scared, frustrated, sad, depressed beyond belief, miserable and tired, unmotivated, anxious, timid, sleepless, nostalgic or just plain ignorant.

The country (UK) is absolutely now I believe one of the worst places to live. We have at the moment the jubilations for the monarch. I will not call them anything else. They have zero power, and are nothing more than figure heads who have a position to act now, as nothing more than idles. Whilst the country sees millions struggle to eat, heat their homes, work or earn enough, soaring health issues due to poor health care from GPs and hospitals, the wealthy yet again blow millions of pounds in our faces. Guess what? That is public money being wasted. This entire weekend is a public funded event, the monarch survives off nothing but public funds. Considering all the issues it is extremely unfair for them to be blowing this money, essentially partying (yet again) to the public expense.

They are laughing in your faces.

I call for you all to stop supporting this ridiculous event and start to support the people who need it. It is the government, governmental bodies and the entire upper class who are in charge of public funds. You ask, well who is that? It is people, just like you or I, hiding behind institutional names and ideas. They are not superior, they are not better in any way. If anything, they are desperate, greedy and rotten soul-less parasites.

It extends beyond just giving them money, and ‘going along with it.’ You are supporting their agenda, their ideas of living. I will not have someone else tell me how to live, what to eat or what to do. Neither should you. Not if the same people are themselves completely ignorant to what they themselves have said. I say again, ‘they are laughing in your faces.’ Trust me, that is not an opinion, or need I remind you of the fact that when the downing street party was exposed, they laughed about it on television to our faces.

You see the agenda is simple, once you realise it you will hopefully wake up and stop feeding the rubbish that claim to act in our best interests. Have you noticed the huge wealth transfer over the last two years? Soaring unemployment, death and disease whilst the rich continue to live protected by bubbles and cotton? It is medieval to say the least. But then again, the institutions are medieval in every way they operate. They are literally stuck thinking in those old ways, so will never embrace change.

🌈Pride Month 22🌈

Happy Pride Month to all those who celebrate this! I want to make this post so that I could briefly talk a little about its history and why it is significant and what we as humans can do to either better understand it or to understand some of the people responsible.

So firstly this is a social movement because it revolves around a social issue. Pride month has been marked since 1970 as June, a time to celebrate what it means to be lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer. Now there is a variety of ‘other’ categories. What it demands is equality from ‘cis’ and ‘heterosexual’ norms. cis is ‘denoting or relating to a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their birth sex’.

When there are Pride marches or parades – particularly here in the UK, Manchester, where the event takes over the city for the month – it is because of the Stonewall uprising. It was a watershed moment in LGBTQ history when patrons of the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Manhattan fought back against a police raid. It is now a national monument. ’22 marks the 52nd anniversary of the event.

Interestingly despite homosexuality being criminalised and frowned upon long before that, it was Henry Gerber in 1924, a German Immigrant who founded the Society for Human Rights in Chicago, and it was the first group to campaign for gay rights in the United States. In 1955 women including Del Martin and Phyllis Lyons founded the Daughters of Bilitis in San Francisco, the first lesbian rights group in the United States. In fact, the first gay pride month was held in Chicago!

The symbol of pride is a rainbow flag. Are you familiar with the story of Harvey Milk? I suspect you may have heard of him or even seen the movie. Well, he was the openly gay San Francisco city supervisor who tasked the artist Gilbert Baker with creating a symbol for the gay community to use in place of the pink triangle. The pink triangle was actually used by the Nazis in concentration camps, when they forced gay men to wear them. Everyone in those camps had a coloured symbol though. Baker created the pride flag in 1978.

President Bill Clinton (one of the better ones I might add) was the first president to recognise pride month, because in 1999 he issued proclamation No. 7203. His successor who was arguably one of the more horrid presidents, George W. Bush, did not recognise it at all.

Now you’ve had a brief overview of the history. Have a wonderful day!

Cooks (6)

Welcome to episode 6 in the Medieval England History series. Last time we looked at medieval castles and their general sort of purpose and structure. Now we dive into the personnel, medieval cooks! If you enjoy this series please be sure to read the other episodes and listen to the voice cast on Spotify.


Medieval cooks, one of the most vital roles in the medieval times! People might not have been eating what we eat today, but I can say this, it was not that bad. A medieval cook would usually prepare the food over an open fire. Castles and noble houses later on had stoves and ovens of there own. Below are some of the cooking equipment, pans, that they would use.

A typical staple diet in medieval times didn’t quite match out 21st Century expectations. But it contained some good grub, for the time. Medieval ages saw a basic diet or food of bread (produced at Lord’s mills). Bread was not the only diet, although the most accessible and most used food source, due to the ease of production.

People of course ate a variety of meats, like chickens, geese, beef, venison and pork. Venison is considered a luxurious meat today (at least that is the impression I got) and would probably cost more than bread in the medieval ages. Back then it was mustard who took the lead as the most popular ingredients, beating salt, as salt was too expensive! Salt was reserved for the wealthy, a bit like the more expensive meats.

A cook working in the royal kitchens would live in the castle or a small village near it (either inside the walls, or just outside). As mentioned in the previous post on castles, it was a busy place and everyone had a role. Cooks were in charge of preparing meals and cleaning the kitchen. They would learn their families recipes and pass them on, as opposed to writing them down, although they probably did at some point (the first medieval cooking book appeared in the 13th Century). Preparing a meal over an open fire was commonplace, a cook used a fireplace or something called a central open ‘hearth.’ Kitchens would have stone floors, as was most common in castles. An open hearth also gave the room heat, thus the cooks would benefit from it. A hearth was usually placed in the center of the living rooms, as opposed to a separate kitchen, which came later on in the medieval ages. As the times progressed and people learned more, they realised the benefits of keeping the cooking separate from the guests, due to the smoke and potential smells etc.

the cooking pot on the fire

Cooks used a variety of tools and pans and were not short of supplies. They had knives, iron cauldrons and pots (picture above), open ovens and hearths etc. wooden spoons, pothangers, dishes, pans and platters. All of these are still available to use today. We see open fires in many living rooms today, and it resembles the cooking methods of medieval ages. Cooks were also distinguishable by their clothing. They would wear clean clothes and woolen aprons. Cooks were highly valued in the medieval ages, especially those a part of the noble or royal kitchen staff.

cooks were highly valued in medieval times!

Cooks were only one of many types of kitchen staff though, and I will briefly outline them, they are: pantlers, bakers, waferers, sauciers, larderers, butchers, carvers, page boys, milkmaids, butlers and scullions! These staff were in the hundreds and would all form part of the kitchen quarters. They were highly valued. You would not see a castle without a cook.

Back in the medieval ages things worked significantly differently, although many techniques have lasted through the ages in terms of food preservation techniques and food transportation. Back then, both preservation and transportation were extremely difficult. Nobles had access to more foreign foods like exotic spices and alcohol because they had the money and the man power to transport quickly. Decrees however would outlaw the consumption of certain foods among certain social classes because the poor or the manual labour of the town or village were considered to need cheaper more poor quality food. The class divide in the medieval times was extremely wide and it is a topic for another episode. But in terms of transport, from the 12th Century, there were improvements in international trade and wars meant dissemination in new food choices to the upper-middle classes of society. Those included things like access to wine and vinegar, black pepper and ginger. The rich or elite all had similar taste in food and drink.

As mentioned bread was a staple diet for many as it was widely available and the cheapest option available. Bakers would produce bread, and they were able to sell to cooks for castles and noble or royal kitchens, but the kitchens in the castle usually had their own bakers. Poor people ate things like barley, oat and rye. Beans and vegetable were eaten by all members of society. The rich would be prepared more expensive meals like swans or peacocks, venison and pork. Because meat was more expensive it was always seen at the dining table of nobles or elite. Fish like cod was popular. Elites usually ate fruits preserved in honey or served in pies, although fruit like apples, oranges, lemons, peaches and berries were more commonly eaten by the poor.

A cook would be paid daily but would not have the job security that a Marshall would have for example. This was due to the fact that a noble could travel and therefore would not need the cook. This was a rough time for holding down a consistent job for many, and back then they probably didn’t have contracts of employment.


Thanks for reading episode 6 – cooks! if you enjoyed this then like, comment, reblog and follow and of course keep a look out for regular episodes coming up in the Medieval England History series. Next time I’ll be talking about another crucial medieval occupation, the baker!